S-400 Air Defense Failure Ukraine But Proved Successful in India’s Operation Sindoor
June 2, 2025 | Global Defense Bureau:
The Russian-made S-400 air defense system is under international scrutiny following a string of reports detailing its failure to intercept Ukrainian drones during the ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe. In sharp contrast, India has announced a major operational success using the same system during its recently concluded Operation Sindoor, where it successfully targeted and destroyed Turkish-origin drones that attempted to breach Indian airspace.
This dramatic contrast has reignited the debate about the real-world effectiveness of the S-400 missile system, one of the most expensive and technologically advanced long-range surface-to-air defense systems in the world.
S-400 Fails to Intercept Ukrainian Drones in Russia
In recent months, Ukrainian forces have intensified their use of low-cost, low-altitude drones to strike Russian military targets deep behind enemy lines. Surprisingly, many of these drones were able to penetrate Russian-controlled airspace without being detected or intercepted by the S-400 air defense batteries, which are deployed around critical Russian infrastructure and military sites.
According to Western intelligence assessments and open-source reports, these drones evaded detection by flying at ultra-low altitudes, using terrain masking, and deploying electronic jamming techniques. This has exposed vulnerabilities in the S-400’s radar tracking and targeting capabilities, especially when dealing with smaller and stealthier UAVs.
Military experts argue that the failure of the S-400 in Ukraine raises important concerns about its performance in high-pressure, dynamic combat scenarios, where drone swarms, electronic warfare, and tactical mobility dominate the battlefield.
India’s Operation Sindoor: S-400 Delivers Tactical Victory
While Russia struggles with operational reliability, India has showcased a different story. During Operation Sindoor, a classified air-defense readiness operation conducted near India’s western and northern borders, the S-400 system proved its worth. Indian defense sources confirmed that multiple Turkish Bayraktar drones, allegedly operated for surveillance or electronic warfare, were successfully intercepted and destroyed before they could gather intelligence or pose a threat.
India had acquired five S-400 units from Russia as part of a strategic defense agreement signed in 2018, despite facing diplomatic pressure and potential U.S. sanctions under CAATSA. The S-400’s success in India now serves as a validation of that decision.
A senior official from India’s Ministry of Defence noted, “The S-400 performed exactly as expected. Its radar detected multiple aerial threats from beyond 250 km, tracked their trajectories, and destroyed them using precise missile strikes before they entered sensitive zones.”
This successful use of S-400 against Turkish drones during Operation Sindoor demonstrates the platform’s effectiveness when deployed with proper integration, intelligence support, and environmental advantage.
Why the S-400 Succeeded in India But Failed in Ukraine
Defense analysts point out that while the S-400 is a powerful air-defense system on paper, its real-world success heavily depends on how and where it’s deployed. India’s static deployment along well-mapped borders, its integration with indigenous radar systems, and coordinated communication between command centers may have given the system a strategic edge during Operation Sindoor.
By contrast, Russia’s S-400 in Ukraine faces constant stress from drone saturation, unpredictable terrain, and multi-directional threats—conditions that make it difficult for even advanced systems to perform at optimal levels.
Some experts argue that Russia has been slow to adapt to asymmetric threats like drone warfare, while India used the S-400 in a controlled, high-readiness scenario that favored the system’s design.
Global Implications and Debate
The mixed global performance of the S-400 is now igniting fresh discussions among nations considering similar purchases. Countries like Iran, Egypt, and even NATO-member Turkey—which also bought S-400 units—may reevaluate the system’s reliability depending on their own threat environments.
Moreover, the system’s failure to stop Ukrainian drones adds fuel to the growing argument that traditional air-defense systems must evolve to counter low-cost, high-impact drone warfare—a feature of modern conflict that’s here to stay.
On the flip side, India’s success could boost its standing as a strategic partner in regional defense and demonstrate its ability to integrate foreign platforms into its existing military infrastructure with precision and planning.
skdass123